Showing posts with label Blacklock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blacklock. Show all posts

No Implied Ratification Where Contract Required Express Written Consent

›
BPX Operating Company v. Strickhausen Supreme Court of Texas, No. 19-0567 (June 11, 2021) Justice Blacklock (opinion available here ) Justic...

SCOTX CLARIFIES IMMUNITY AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES FOR ATTORNEYS

›
Haynes and Boone, LLP v. NFTD, LLC Supreme Court of Texas, No. 20-0066 (May 21, 2021) Justice Bland (opinion available here ) Landry’s, Inc....

SCOTx AGAIN TELLS INSURERS: WAITING FOR AN APPRAISAL CAN TRIGGER DELAYED-PAYMENT PENALTIES

›
State Farm Lloyds v. Hinojos Supreme Court of Texas, No. 19-0280 (March 19, 2021) Opinion by Justice Bland linked here . Dissents by Justice...

EIGHT-CORNERS RULE LIVES ON

›
Richards v. State Farm Lloyds Supreme Court of Texas (March 20, 2020) Opinion by Justice Blacklock ( linked here ) Lyndon Bittle The ...

LEGAL MALPRACTICE CLAIMS AGAINST CRIMINAL-DEFENSE ATTORNEYS: SCOTX CLARIFIES LIMITATIONS AND THE “EXONERATION” REQUIREMENT OF PEELER v. HUGHES & LUCE

›
Gray v. Skelton Supreme Court of Texas, No. 18-0386 (February 21, 2019) Opinion by Justice Devine (linked here ), dissent by Justice Black...

IN A DERIVATIVE SUIT, CAN THE SAME LAWYERS REPRESENT THE LLC AND MEMBERS ACCUSED OF BEING ADVERSE TO THE LLC? MAYBE.

›
In re Murrin Brothers 1885, Ltd. Supreme Court of Texas, No. 18-0737 (December 20, 2019) Opinion by Justice Blacklock (linked here ) Ken...