Showing posts with label
Rubin
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
Rubin
.
Show all posts
Penny Wise But Pound Foolish. Serving as Your Company’s Registered Agent Can Be Costly in the Long Run
›
Huffman Asset Management, LLC v. Colter Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-22-00779-CV (November 8, 2023) Justices Partida-Kipness (Opinion, li...
As Long as There’s a Plan—Resolving Defenses after Class Certification
›
Topletz v. Choice Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-22-00781-CV (August 22, 2023) Justices Carlyle (Opinion, linked here ), Goldstein, and Ken...
Gone, But Not Forgotten: Broker Entitled to Commission After Its Listing Terminated
›
Ebby Halliday Real Estate, Inc. v. Giambrone Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-22-00386-CV (February 28, 2023) Justices Reichek, Nowell, and G...
Distribution Center Deemed “Principal Office” Under Venue Statute
›
Deere & Co. v. Bernal Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-22-00916-CV (January 17, 2023) Justices Pedersen (Opinion, linked here ), Goldstei...
Fifth Court: Twenty-Plus Years of Precedent on Bankruptcy Trustee’s “Exclusive Standing” Implicitly Overruled by SCOTX
›
Moser v. Dillon Investments, LLC Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-21-00204-CV (August 2, 2022) Justices Myers (Opinion, linked here ), Osbo...
“Taking Responsibility” ≠ Negligence as a Matter of Law
›
Yedlapalli v. Jaldu Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-20-00531-CV (June 28, 2022) Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness (Opinion, linked here ), and...
Not So Fast: Trial Court Cannot Compel Discovery While Plea to Jurisdiction Attacking Pleadings Is Pending
›
In re Dallas County, Texas and Dallas County Constable Bill Gipson Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-21-01144 (May 10, 2022) Justices Myers, P...
Mandamus Relief for Denial of Advancement of Defense Costs
›
In re DeMattia Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-21-00460-CV (April 12, 2022) Justices Schenck, Nowell (Opinion, linked here ), and Garcia Bre...
Court-Ordered Mediation on Appeal
›
Newsom, Terry & Newsom, LLP v. Henry S. Miller Commercial Co. Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-20-00379-CV (February 22, 2022) Justice Ca...
Squashed: Probate Exception Does Not Provide Jurisdiction over Roach’s Appeal
›
John H. Roach. v. Patricia S. Roach Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-21-00754-CV (February 15, 2022) Justices Molberg, Goldstein (Opinion, li...
No Evidence? No Problem! Court Takes Judicial Notice of Property Records to Dismiss Based on Mootness
›
Courtney D. Alsobrook v. MTGLQ Investors, LP Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-20-00400-CV (October 26, 2021) Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness ...
Beyond Mandamus: Writ of Injunction Secures Relief from Trial Court Order Pending Appeal
›
In re David Mu Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-21-00323 (October 12, 2021) Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle (Opinion, linked her...
WHAT’S HAPPENING WITH MY APPEAL? TCPA CASE SHEDS LIGHT ON COURT’S PROCESSES
›
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A. v. Whitney Kelley Mahana Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-18-01414 (August 27, 2019) Justices Bridg...
THE TCPA’S FINAL FRONTIER? COURT OF APPEALS DECLINES TO ADDRESS WHETHER TCPA APPLIES TO FAMILY LAW CASE
›
Smith v. Malone Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-18-00216-CV (November 27, 2018) Justices Myers, Evans (Opinion, linked here ), and Brown ...
YES, THE TCPA PROTECTS LAWYERS’ SPEECH, TOO
›
Youngkin v. Hines Supreme Court of Texas, No. 16-0935 (April 17, 2018) Justice Lehrmann (Opinion, linked here ) Brent Rubin During tr...
LESS ONEROUS NOTICE REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO RULE 202 PETITION WHEN SUIT IS NOT “ANTICIPATED”
›
Glassdoor, Inc. v. Andra Group, LP Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-16-00189-CV (March 24, 2017) Justices Francis, Stoddart, and Whitehill ...
SCOTX REMINDS PLAINTIFFS TO CHECK ALL THE BOXES BEFORE FILING A CLAIM AGAINST AN ARCHITECT
›
Levinson Alcoser Associates, L.P. v. El Pistolón II, Ltd. Supreme Court of Texas, No. 15-0232 (February 24, 2017) Justice Brown (Opinion, ...
“ANALYTICAL GAP” TEST, NOT ROBINSON FACTORS, APPLIES TO TESTIMONY OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIST
›
Texas Capital Bank v. Asche Dallas Court of Appeals, No. 05-15-00102-CV (February 17, 2017) Justices Bridges, Francis, and Whitehill (Opin...
“IF YOU COME AT THE KING, YOU BEST NOT MISS”—SCOTX REFINES ULTRA VIRES EXCEPTION TO SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
›
Hall v. McRaven Supreme Court of Texas, No. 16-0773 (January 27, 2017) Justice Devine (Opinion linked here ); Justice Willett ( Concurring...
›
Home
View web version